Gun Shows


Home    Contents    Contact Us    Gun Shows    Military Shows   Advertising    AR-15    Gun Shops


Gun Show listings throughout United States.
Auctions - Gun - Knife - Military Shows

AGS Offices Hours are Monday thru Friday  9:00am to 6:00pm
Office - 281-570-3383    Closed Sat. and Sun


Gun Dealers Special Section

Websites of Interest
Montana: Political Speech Suppression Legislation Moved to House Floor in Unorthodox Procedural Maneuver

Yesterday, political speech suppression legislation, Senate Bill 289, was taken from committee and placed on second reading in the House in a procedural maneuver by proponents.  Sponsored by state Senator Duane Ankney (R-20), SB 289 seeks to suppress political speech by organizations such as the NRA which informs Second Amendment supporters on election-related issues and updates. NRA

Apparently her oath of office to protect the second amendment has died since she was voted into office. I guess we need to make a note of that the next election. We need political servants that still work for the people. Editor
Colorado's gun debate will likely rage on for years 
Colorado's mandatory background checks on private gun sales and a ban on high-capacity magazines are unlikely to be repealed this year, but only because of a razor-thin margin. "I think eventually they will be overturned, who knows when, but I think eventually," says Rep. Ed Vigil, one of two Democratic votes in the House needed to send repeal bills to the governor's desk. "I don't think they will be a permanent fixture in Colorado for 100 years.

Remember Voting matters - you want to continue to loose your rights keep voting for gun haters idiots . editor
Kansas lawmakers moving to OK concealed carry with no permit. Permits are unconstitutional anyway.

Kansas is close to allowing residents 21 or older to carry concealed firearms without a state permit. The state House was debating a bill Wednesday to end the permit requirement. The Senate approved the measure last month, and House members so far have made only one technical change in committee.

I'm glad to see this start, since taxing, permits or any other  restriction on carrying and protect is a violation of case law and unconstitutional.

1. Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." -  Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 491.
Hertado v. California, 110 U.S. 516. states very plainly: "The State cannot diminish rights of the people."
3. "The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.· - 
Miller v. U.S., 230 F 2d 486, 489.
many more if you look.

What will happen when the people finds out the states have committed fraud on them and turned their Constitutional rights into privileges.

The forgotten legal truth is that free people have a right to travel on the roads which are provided by their servants and tax dollars for that purpose, using ordinary transportation of the day. Licensing cannot be required of free people, because taking on the restrictions of a license requires the surrender of a right. The driver's license can be required of people who use the highways for trade, commerce, or hire; that is, if they earn their living on the road, and if they use extraordinary machines on the roads. In other words, if you are not using the highways for profit, you cannot be required to have a driver's license.

The problem to correct this current behavior is worsened by our servants that took an oath to protect and serve and support the constitution follows our enemies directions. So unless the people stand together to rain in this corruption nothing will change. People fighting this fraud and corruption as a single citizen will continue to be attacked from every direction with no ability to fight the unlimited power of the government machine. As I have heard our servants say many times neither the law nor the constitution matters, we are the law. Is American that far gone. Read further along with dozens of case history

Jury Nullification: Why every American needs to learn about this but why most people have no clue the power available to them as a juror.

This is a power jurors have that exceeds the judges power and judges are livid when it happens. It’s absurd but not surprising  that such an immense power remains a secret to jurors throughout the process.

No matter the evidence, if a jury feels a law is unjust, it is permitted to “nullify” the law rather than finding someone guilty? Basically, jury nullification is a jury’s way of saying, “By the letter of the law, the defendant is guilty, but we also disagree with that law, so we vote to not punish the accused.” Ultimately, the verdict serves as an acquittal.

Haven’t heard of jury nullification? You’re far from alone, your unfamiliarity is by design. This is a power jurors have that exceeds the judges power and judges are livid when it happens.

Defense lawyers are not allowed to even mention jury nullification as a possibility during a trial because judges want juries to follow his directions and not think for themselves to delivering independent verdicts.

The Supreme Court has routinely agreed that judges have no obligation to inform juries about jury nullification. Yet jury nullification is permitted to exist as an option to all juries, yet this option cannot be discussed in courtrooms. Why because it put the power of jurors above the judges and the law.

A few years ago, Julian Heicklen handed out pamphlets to passersby on jury nullification to people outside of a federal courthouse. While the former professor was merely attempting to educate people about how the jury system works, he was charged with jury tampering. The prosecution labeled Heicklen “a significant and important threat to our judicial system,” but the judge ultimately disagreed and dismissed the case. Nonetheless, the fact that this case went to court at all shows how those in the legal system are willing to intimidate those who vocalize this loophole.

Jury nullification is undoubtedly feared because of its ability to upset the system. A jury that considers drug laws to be outrageous can nullify. A jury that is aware of the mass inequality in incarceration rates and believes a defendant was targeted via racial profiling can nullify. A jury that believes a harmless defendant is a victim of the prison industrial complex rather than a perpetrator can nullify. This counter-verdict exists so that citizens can right the wrongs inherent in our supposed “justice” system.

Whether or not you choose to exercise the option of jury nullification the next time you serve on a jury is up to your own discretion, but all jurors should at least be aware that this option is available to them. But do not say anything in the courtroom and your own vote.

American Gun Shows  Copyright © February 2007 All Rights Reserved